GHSA-pph8-gcv7-4qj5 json
PyO3 Risk of buffer overflow in `PyString::from_object`
published last yr. modified 2mo ago also RUSTSEC-2025-0020
- cvss
- —
- not scored
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- —
- no score, EPSS covers CVEs only
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
`PyString::from_object` took `&str` arguments and forwarded them directly to the Python C API without checking for terminating nul bytes. This could lead the Python interpreter to read beyond the end of the `&str` data and potentially leak contents of the out-of-bounds read (by raising a Python exception containing a copy of the data including the overflow).
In PyO3 0.24.1 this function will now allocate a `CString` to guarantee a terminating nul bytes. PyO3 0.25 will likely offer an alternative API which takes `&CStr` arguments.
Patch / fix
Is GHSA-pph8-gcv7-4qj5 in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerAffected packages
| ecosystem | package | affected | fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| crates.io | pyo3 | >=0.1.0, <0.24.1 >=0.0.0-0, <0.24.1 |
0.24.1 |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read
References
-
github.com
/PyO3/pyo3/pull/5008
web
-
github.com
/PyO3/pyo3/issues/5005
web, report
-
github.com
/PyO3/pyo3
package
-
rustsec.org
/advisories/RUSTSEC-2025-0020.html
web, advisory
-
crates.io
/crates/pyo3
package
Sources
- GitHub Advisory GHSA-pph8-gcv7-4qj5
- OSV RUSTSEC-2025-0020
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.