Skip to content
Fencer Intel
low 3.1

GHSA-pxh5-6rrc-8rjv json

OpenTofu: Excessive resource usage in "tofu init" when installing dependencies from attacker-controlled server

published 5mo ago modified 2mo ago also GO-2026-5558

cvss
3.1
version 3.1, GitHub
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
—
no score, EPSS covers CVEs only
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

### Impact Unauthenticated denial of service.

### Summary

When installing provider or module packages from attacker-controlled servers, the server may cause `tofu init`to enter an infinite loop sending garbage data to that server.

Those who depend on modules or providers served from untrusted third-party servers may experience denial of service due to `tofu init` failing to complete successfully. Other processes running on the same computer as OpenTofu may also fail or have their performance degraded due to the depletion of shared system resources.

These vulnerabilities **do not** permit arbitrary code execution or allow disclosure of confidential information.

### Details

OpenTofu relies a third-party implementations of HTTP2 from the standard library of the Go programming language.

The Go project has recently published the following advisory for that implementation, which indirectly affects OpenTofu's behavior:

- [CVE-2026-33814](https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-33814): Infinite loop in HTTP/2 transport when given bad SETTINGS_MAX_FRAME_SIZE in net/http/internal/http2 in golang.org/x/net

OpenTofu's threat model considers module and package dependencies to be arbitrary third-party code that operators must carefully review after installation. However, these particular problems affect the process of _installing_ these dependencies with `tofu init`, and so can potentially occur before an operator has had the opportunity to review what is being installed. In particular, the described problem would occur before OpenTofu actually retrieves a dependency package and performs checksum verification, because it affect the transport of the packages rather than the content of the packages.

An attacker can exploit this by controlling the HTTP2 implementation of the server where the dependencies are hosted, causing it to send a crafted "SETTINGS" frame which sets the maximum frame size to zero.

However, the attacker must also coerce an OpenTofu operator into attempting dependency installation from the server they control. Typical use of OpenTofu already requires caution in selection of third-party dependencies because they are arbitrary code, and so the vulnerability here is only in the addition of a potential denial of service in the `tofu init` process, which does not execute third-party dependency code itself.

### Patches

OpenTofu v1.11.8 addresses this vulnerability by being built against Go 1.25.10, which contains an improved version of the upstream implementation.

The OpenTofu v1.10 and v1.9 series are also impacted by this vulnerability. However, those series are built with a version of Go for which no upstream fix is available. Adopting Go 1.25.10 for those series would effectively end support for certain versions of macOS, and the OpenTofu Project has determined that the impact of these vulnerabilities is not high enough to justify that disruption in a patch release. For those using the OpenTofu v1.10 or v1.9 releases we recommend planning to upgrade to OpenTofu v1.11.8 in the near future, and reviewing the Workarounds section below in the meantime.

### Workarounds

This vulnerability can be exploited only if an attacker can coerce an operator to add a dependency from an attacker-controlled source to their configuration before running `tofu init`. Those who are unable to upgrade can therefore minimize risk by reviewing new dependencies before adding them to the configuration, such as by directly fetching the relevant artifacts using software other than OpenTofu.

Successful exploitation requires that the attacker control an HTTP2 server that `tofu init` would contact during dependency installation. Note that OpenTofu modules can have their own dependencies on other providers and modules, so an attacker could potentially use a module served from a source such as GitHub or the OpenTofu Registry to indirectly request a module from a server they control.

### References

- [OpenTofu v1.11.8 Release Notes](https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/releases/tag/v1.11.8) - https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/pull/4098 - https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/issues/4094

Patch / fix

  • go github.com/opentofu/opentofu 1.11.8

Is GHSA-pxh5-6rrc-8rjv in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
GitHub 3.1 3.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Affected packages

ecosystem package affected fixed in
go github.com/opentofu/opentofu
<1.11.8
1.11.8

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-835 Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.