Skip to content
Fencer Intel
low —

GHSA-q66h-m87m-j2q6 json

Bitcoinrb Vulnerable to Command injection via RPC

published 9mo ago modified 9mo ago

cvss
—
not scored
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
—
no score, EPSS covers CVEs only
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

### Summary: Remote Code Execution Unsafe handling of request parameters in the RPC HTTP server results in command injection

### Details In lib/bitcoin/rpc/http_server.rb line 30-39, the JSON body of a POST request is parsed into `command` and `args` variables. These values are then passed to `send`, which is used to call an arbitrary class method. However, there is no validation that the provided `command` value is one of the expected RPC methods. This means that an attacker could supply a `command` value such as `system`, and then pass arbitrary system commands into the `args` parameter and achieve remote code execution.

### PoC 1. Start the RPC server 2. Send a request to the RPC server as so: ``` curl -X POST http://127.0.0.1:18443 -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{"method":"eval","params":["File.write(\"/tmp/pwned\",\"owned\")"]}' ``` 3. Check the /tmp folder on the machine where the RPC server is being run. If a folder /pwned now exists, the vulnerability is confirmed. ### Impact This vulnerability would impact anyone running the RPC server. The impact is higher for those who are running it publicly exposed to the internet.

### Remediation

**Mitigating Factors:** - The RPC server is part of the experimental SPV node feature, which is not documented and has very few users. - The SPV-related features may be removed in future releases.

**Resolution:** - Added whitelist validation to allow only RPC methods defined in `RequestHandler`. - Fixed in version 1.12.0.

Patch / fix

Is GHSA-q66h-m87m-j2q6 in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

Affected packages

ecosystem package affected fixed in
rubygems bitcoinrb
<1.12.0
1.12.0

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-77 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.