Skip to content
Fencer Intel
medium 6.5

GHSA-q855-8rh5-jfgq json

ha-mcp: Add-on settings and policy routes are reachable without authentication at the bare root path

published 4mo ago modified 4mo ago

cvss
6.5
version 3.1, GitHub
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
—
no score, EPSS covers CVEs only
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

### Summary

In add-on mode, the ha-mcp settings UI routes are mounted both under the MCP secret path **and** at the bare root of the published port (`:9583`), so Home Assistant ingress can serve the "Open Web UI" button. The root-mounted routes perform no authentication — no secret, no `Origin` check, no CSRF token — so any client that can reach `:9583` without the MCP secret can invoke them.

### Affected configurations

Home Assistant **add-on** installations (`host_network: true` with port `9583` published), v7.6.0 and earlier. Docker and standalone installs are **not** affected — there the settings routes are mounted only under the secret path.

Root-mounted routes in affected versions: tool visibility (`/api/settings/tools` GET/POST), feature flags (`/api/settings/features` GET/POST), the auto-backup suite (`/api/settings/backups…` incl. restore/delete, and `/api/settings/backup-config`), add-on restart (`/api/settings/restart`), and — when the opt-in Tool Security Policies feature is enabled — the approval-policy API (`/api/policy/config` GET/PUT, `/api/policy/approve`, `/api/policy/deny`, …).

### Impact

Without authentication, a caller that reaches `:9583` — a peer on the local network, a reverse proxy/tunnel that forwards the bare root path (e.g. a whole-host Cloudflared config), or a CSRF `POST` from a page open in a LAN browser — can read or change which MCP tools are exposed, toggle feature flags, list/view/restore/delete backups, restart the add-on, and (with Tool Security Policies enabled) read and rewrite the approval policy, disabling the human-approval gate on gated tools.

There is **no** access to Home Assistant data, entities, or credentials, and no code execution. All effects are confined to the add-on's own configuration and lifecycle and are recoverable. The primary (same-LAN) vector is within the add-on's documented trusted-network model; remote reachability requires the operator to have reverse-proxied the bare port.

### Proof of concept

With the add-on running and reachable on `:9583`, from any host that can reach the port without the secret:

``` GET /api/settings/tools -> 200 (read tool config, no auth) POST /api/settings/tools {"states":{}} -> 200 (rewrite tool config, no auth / no CSRF token) POST /api/settings/restart -> 200 (restart the add-on) ```

The MCP endpoint itself remains correctly protected by the secret path.

### Patch

Fixed in PR homeassistant-ai/ha-mcp#1508 (merged to `master`): the root-mounted add-on routes are restricted to Home Assistant ingress, which always originates from the Supervisor (`172.30.32.2`); every other caller receives `403`. Direct and remote access continue to use the settings UI under the MCP secret path (`…/<secret>/settings`), so the "Open Web UI" button, Cloudflared, and the Webhook Proxy add-on are unaffected.

The fix will ship in the next stable add-on release. If you'd rather have it now, it is already on the dev channel (add-on dev build ` 7.6.0.dev393` or later) — optional; there's no need to switch channels just for this, it is a fairly low risk surface and only exposes the web UI for addon mode only.

### Severity

`CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L` = 6.4 (Moderate). Confidentiality impact is None — tool config and backups are not secrets or credentials; integrity and availability impacts are Low — configuration changes and an add-on restart are recoverable.

### Credit

Reported by @bharat.

Patch / fix

  • pypi ha-mcp 7.10.0

Is GHSA-q855-8rh5-jfgq in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
GitHub 3.1 6.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Affected packages

ecosystem package affected fixed in
pypi ha-mcp
<7.10.0
7.10.0

Classification

Weakness
  • CWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Functionality
  • CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.