GHSA-rjvx-x5h2-6px5 json
Gitea: API Fork Endpoint Authorization Bypass Allows Organization Members to Bypass Repository Creation Restrictions
published 3mo ago modified 3mo ago also GO-2026-6074
- cvss
- —
- not scored
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- —
- no score, EPSS covers CVEs only
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
### Summary
The API endpoint used to fork repositories into organizations performs a weaker authorization check than the corresponding web UI and other repository creation endpoints.
When a repository is forked into an organization through the API, the endpoint only verifies that the user is an organization member (`IsOrgMember()`), but does not verify whether the user is allowed to create repositories in that organization (`CanCreateOrgRepo()`).
As a result, organization members belonging to teams with `can_create_org_repo=false` can still create repositories inside the organization by using the fork API.
### Details
Affected endpoint:
``` POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/forks ```
In `routers/api/v1/repo/fork.go`, the endpoint performs the following authorization check:
```go if !ctx.Doer.IsAdmin { isMember, err := org.IsOrgMember(ctx, ctx.Doer.ID) if !isMember { ctx.APIError(http.StatusForbidden, ...) return } } ```
The equivalent web UI implementation uses the stronger permission check:
```go isAllowedToFork, err := organization.OrgFromUser(ctxUser). CanCreateOrgRepo(ctx, ctx.Doer.ID) ```
The same `CanCreateOrgRepo()` authorization check is also used by:
* CreateOrgRepo API endpoint * GenerateRepository API endpoint
The fork endpoint appears to be the only repository creation path that relies solely on organization membership.
### Proof of Concept
Tested on Gitea 1.23.7.
1. Create an organization. 2. Create a team with `can_create_org_repo=false`. 3. Add a test user to that team. 4. Verify that normal repository creation is denied:
```http POST /api/v1/orgs/target-org/repos ```
Result:
```http 403 Forbidden ```
5. Fork a repository into the organization:
```http POST /api/v1/repos/admin/public-repo/forks Content-Type: application/json
{ "organization": "target-org" } ```
Result:
```http 202 Accepted ```
The repository is successfully created despite repository creation permissions being disabled.
### Impact
Users who are organization members but are intentionally prevented from creating repositories can bypass that restriction through the API.
This allows unauthorized repository creation inside the organization and may expose additional attack surface depending on the organization's Actions, runner, and workflow configuration.
The vulnerability represents an authorization bypass because API behavior is less restrictive than both the web UI and other repository creation endpoints.
Patch / fix
- go code.gitea.io/gitea 1.26.0
- github.com/go-gitea/gitea@686d10b commit
- github.com/go-gitea/gitea#36950 pull request
- github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases/tag/v1.26.0 release
Is GHSA-rjvx-x5h2-6px5 in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerAffected packages
| ecosystem | package | affected | fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| go | code.gitea.io/gitea | <1.26.0 |
1.26.0 |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization
References
Sources
- GitHub Advisory GHSA-rjvx-x5h2-6px5
- OSV GO-2026-6074
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.