GHSA-w5x2-6474-pqp4 json
A 512-byte workbook can provoke a multi-gigabyte allocation and abort the process
published last mo. modified last mo. also RUSTSEC-2026-0317
- cvss
- 5.5
- version 3.1, OSV
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- —
- no score, EPSS covers CVEs only
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
Affected versions passed caller-supplied bytes to `calamine`'s `Xlsx::new` without first checking that they were a ZIP archive. `Xlsx::new` tests for password protection on its first line, which parses the input as an OLE/CFB container, and a sector-count field read from the file's own header reaches `Vec::with_capacity` without being checked against the file's actual length. A 512-byte input can therefore request several gigabytes; 9,261,285,372 bytes was measured.
**The oversized allocation is always attempted. Whether it aborts depends on what the allocator can satisfy.** On a large host with overcommit the reservation is granted untouched and the call returns an ordinary "not an xlsx file" error, which looks like a malformed file being correctly rejected. Under a memory limit the same bytes give `memory allocation of N bytes failed` and the process aborts, which is not a `Result` a caller can handle. Containers with a memory limit, small hosts and CI runners are where this lands, so testing on a development machine can wrongly suggest the crate is unaffected.
Every entry point reaches it, not only `compare_bytes`: the path- and reader-based APIs funnel through the same internal open. Neither `Limits::default()` nor `Limits::hardened()` prevents it, because `max_input_bytes` bounds the length of the input while the allocation's size comes from a field inside it.
Fixed in 3.2.0, which declines input that does not begin with the ZIP magic before the parser sees it, removing the path rather than bounding it. Callers who cannot upgrade can apply the same check before calling this crate.
The underlying defect is in `calamine`, reported there independently as [tafia/calamine#714](https://github.com/tafia/calamine/issues/714) and unfixed at the time of writing. It is reachable from any crate that opens untrusted bytes with `Xlsx::new`.
Patch / fix
Is GHSA-w5x2-6474-pqp4 in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerCVSS scores
| assigned by | version | score | vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| OSV | 3.1 | 5.5 | CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H |
Affected packages
| ecosystem | package | affected | fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| crates.io | sheets-diff | >=0.0.0-0, <3.2.0 |
3.2.0 |
References
-
github.com
/forskscope/sheets-diff-rs/commit/fb70d62c88ca906284703c8071e51951c6ab43e2
web
-
crates.io
/crates/sheets-diff
package
-
rustsec.org
/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0317.html
advisory
-
github.com
/forskscope/sheets-diff-rs/blob/3.2.0/CHANGELOG.md#320---2026-09-29
web
-
github.com
/tafia/calamine/issues/714
report
Sources
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.