GHSA-wrr4-782v-jhwh json
neotoma has tenant isolation gap in relationship query endpoints
published 4mo ago modified 4mo ago
- cvss
- —
- not scored
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- —
- no score, EPSS covers CVEs only
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
## Summary
The `/list_relationships` and `/retrieve_graph_neighborhood` endpoints call `getAuthenticatedUserId` (confirming a valid session exists) but do not pass the resolved user ID into the Supabase query as an `.eq("user_id", userId)` filter. As a result, queries return rows from all users rather than scoping to the authenticated caller's data.
## Affected code
**`/list_relationships`** (`src/actions.ts`): - Calls `getAuthenticatedUserId` but does not apply `.eq("user_id", userId)` to the relationships query - Uses `.or()` string interpolation for entity ID matching without input validation
**`/retrieve_graph_neighborhood`** (`src/actions.ts`): - Same pattern: auth resolved, user ID not applied to query filter
## Affected versions
v0.13.0
## Prerequisites
1. A valid authentication token for the Neotoma instance (attacker must have a legitimate account on the same instance) 2. A known entity ID belonging to another user (~96 bits of entropy — brute-force not practical)
An unauthenticated caller is rejected at the auth middleware layer. The gap requires a second user account on the instance.
## Impact
An authenticated user with a known cross-user entity ID can retrieve relationship edges and graph neighborhood data belonging to another user. No write capability is exposed.
## Severity
Low under current conditions — no multi-tenant deployments exist. Escalates to Medium the moment two or more user accounts share an instance.
## Remediation
1. Add `.eq("user_id", userId)` to all Supabase queries in both handlers 2. Validate entity ID inputs with `isNeotomaEntityId` before query construction 3. Replace `.or()` string interpolation with separate scoped `.eq()` calls
Fix tracked in #365 (list_relationships) and #366 (retrieve_graph_neighborhood). Gate gap tracked in #372.
Patch / fix
- npm neotoma 0.14.0
Is GHSA-wrr4-782v-jhwh in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerAffected packages
| ecosystem | package | affected | fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | neotoma | >=0.13.0, <0.14.0 |
0.14.0 |
Classification
- Weakness
-
- CWE-201 Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data
References
Sources
- GitHub Advisory GHSA-wrr4-782v-jhwh
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.