PYSEC-2023-1 json
Adyen has utility methods for validating notification HMAC signatures.
published 3y ago modified 3y ago
- cvss
- —
- not scored
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- —
- no score, EPSS covers CVEs only
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
Adyen has utility methods for validating notification HMAC signatures. The is_valid_hmac and is_valid_hmac_notification methods are vulnerable to a timing attack, you should compare the hash of the HMACs instead.
Patch / fix
Is PYSEC-2023-1 in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerAffected packages
| ecosystem | package | affected | fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| pypi | adyen | >=2.2.0, <7.1.0 |
7.1.0 |
References
Sources
- OSV PYSEC-2023-1
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.