RUSTSEC-2026-0106 json
Record cache accepts AUTHORITY section NS from sibling zone via parent-pool zone-context elevation
published 6mo ago modified 6mo ago
- cvss
- —
- not scored
- cisa kev
- Not listed
- not in CISA's catalog
- epss
- —
- no score, EPSS covers CVEs only
- public exploits
- 0
- none known
Summary
The Hickory DNS project's experimental `hickory-recursor` crate's record cache (`DnsLru`) stores records from DNS responses keyed by each record's own (name, type), not by the query that triggered the response. `cache_response()` in `crates/recursor/src/lib.rs` chains `ANSWER`, `AUTHORITY`, and `ADDITIONAL` sections into one record iterator before insertion. The bailiwick filter it applies uses the zone context of the NS pool that serviced the lookup, not the zone being queried.
This creates a cross-zone poisoning path. When Hickory builds the NS pool for `attacker.poc.` it uses the parent `poc.` `NS` pool (`ns.zone() = "poc."`). If the `poc.` nameserver under the attacker's control includes in its response's `AUTHORITY` section a record for a sibling zone like `victim.poc. NS ns.evil.poc.`, the bailiwick check `is_subzone("poc.", "victim.poc.")` passes (`victim.poc.` is a subdomain of `poc.`). The record is stored under `(victim.poc., NS)` in the shared cache.
Subsequently, any client querying a name in `victim.poc`. causes Hickory to build its NS pool from the poisoned cache entry, routing queries to the attacker's nameserver (`ns.evil.poc.`) rather than to the legitimate nameserver for `victim.poc.`. The legitimate `NS` for that zone receives zero queries.
This issue is fixed in `hickory-resolver` 0.26.0 with the `recursor` feature through an architectural change to response-level caching: responses are stored keyed by the originating query `(name, type)`. A response to `(attacker.poc. NS)` is stored only under that key and cannot affect the `(victim.poc., NS)` cache entry.
We believe this issue has been present in all published versions of the experimental `hickory-recursor` crate, which has now been folded into the `hickory-resolver` crate under the non-default `recursor` feature flag. The `hickory-recursor` crate will not receive any updates going forward and all users should migrate to `hickory-resolver` with the `recursor` feature.
Is RUSTSEC-2026-0106 in your dependencies? Fencer shows which of your repositories are affected as soon as an advisory lands, and opens the fix as a pull request.
Check with FencerAffected packages
| ecosystem | package | affected | fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| crates.io | hickory-recursor | >=0.0.0-0 |
no fix listed |
References
Sources
Fencer Intel keeps one entry per vulnerability: the CVE id wins, then GHSA, and records that alias each other are merged, except that two CVEs always keep separate entries. The same data is available as JSON.